z-logo
Premium
Creaturely Solidarity
Author(s) -
Kao Grace Y.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of religious ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.306
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1467-9795
pISSN - 0384-9694
DOI - 10.1111/jore.12080
Subject(s) - premise , argumentation theory , epistemology , sociology , solidarity , identification (biology) , categorization , passion , revelation , politics , philosophy , political science , psychology , social psychology , law , botany , biology , theology
This essay examines several recent contributions to the growing literature on animal ethics from C hristian perspectives. I categorize the four books under review in one of three ways depending on the scholars' methodological points of departure: (1) a reconstruction of the place of other animals in C hristian history through a selective retrieval of texts and practices; (2) an identification of a key C hristian ethical principle; and (3) a reconsideration of foundational doctrines of systematic theology. On the premise that social ethicists are interested in not only understanding the world, but also changing it, I observe that these authors have offered different answers to the following three questions: (1) whether the theoretical basis for reform is ultimately grounded upon notions of human sameness or difference with other animals; (2) whether scholar‐activists should emphasize logic over passion or values over interests (or vice versa) in their calls for transformation; and (3) whether moral motivation for their targeted audiences is best served by reliance upon secular argumentation and interdisciplinary research or upon the distinctive claims of revelation and other tradition‐specific norms. I conclude by offering my own thoughts about which approaches might prove more effective than others.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here