Premium
Medical Manichaeism
Author(s) -
Campbell Austin L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of religious ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.306
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1467-9795
pISSN - 0384-9694
DOI - 10.1111/jore.12015
Subject(s) - epistemology , criticism , constructive , sociology , aesthetics , philosophy , law , political science , operating system , process (computing) , computer science
Medical discourse in the contemporary U nited S tates is rife with military metaphors. These metaphors have come under vigorous criticism over the last few decades but to no avail; the militaristic tendency has proven tenacious. This essay suggests that its tenacity stems, at least in part, from a dualistic understanding of medicine unaddressed by prior criticisms. For an alternative, this essay turns to A ugustine of H ippo, balancing close readings of works that deal explicitly with medical themes— The Catholic Way of Life and the M anichean Way of Life (De moribus ) and The Nature of the Good (De natura boni )—with a constructive approach. By adapting A ugustine's privative account of evil, we can understand disease as a condition of loss and treatment as a task of restoration. This reconfiguration shifts the focus of our interpretive discourses from malicious invaders to a fuller affirmation of the lived experiences of those who are ill.