Premium
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SPIRITUAL COPING STRATEGIES SCALE ARABIC VERSION IN SAUDI PATIENTS UNDERGOING HAEMODIALYSIS
Author(s) -
Cruz Jonas P.,
Baldacchino Donia R.,
Alquwez Nahed
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of renal care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.381
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1755-6686
pISSN - 1755-6678
DOI - 10.1111/jorc.12155
Subject(s) - medicine , arabic , coping (psychology) , scale (ratio) , validity , reliability (semiconductor) , clinical psychology , physical therapy , psychometrics , cartography , philosophy , linguistics , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , geography
SUMMARY Background Patients often resort to religious and spiritual activities to cope with physical and mental challenges. The effect of spiritual coping on overall health, adaptation and health‐related quality of life among patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) is well documented. Thus, it is essential to establish a valid and reliable instrument that can assess both the religious and non‐religious coping methods in patients undergoing HD. Objective This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale Arabic version (SCS‐A) in Saudi patients undergoing HD. Method A convenience sample of 60 Saudi patients undergoing HD was recruited for this descriptive, cross‐sectional study. Data were collected between May and June 2015. Forward–backward translation was used to formulate the SCS‐A. The SCS‐A, Muslim Religiosity Scale and the Quality of Life Index Dialysis Version III were used to procure the data. Internal consistency reliability, stability reliability, factor analysis and construct validity tests were performed. Analyses were set at the 0.05 level of significance. Results The SCS‐A showed an acceptable internal consistency and strong stability reliability over time. The EFA produced two factors (non‐religious and religious coping). Satisfactory construct validity was established by the convergent and divergent validity and known‐groups method. Conclusion The SCS‐A is a reliable and valid tool that can be used to measure the religious and non‐religious coping strategies of patients undergoing HD in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim and Arabic‐speaking countries.