Premium
Within‐couple configuration of gender‐related attitudes and its association with marital satisfaction in Chinese marriage: A dyadic, pattern‐analytic approach
Author(s) -
Cao Hongjian,
Li Xiaomin,
Chi Peilian,
Du Hongfei,
Wu Qinglu,
Liang Yue,
Zhou Nan,
Fine Mark A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of personality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.082
H-Index - 144
eISSN - 1467-6494
pISSN - 0022-3506
DOI - 10.1111/jopy.12467
Subject(s) - psychology , context (archaeology) , china , association (psychology) , social psychology , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , paleontology , political science , law , psychotherapist , biology
Objective This study seeks to understand the ways in which spouses’ gender‐related attitudes are configured within couples and how such configurations are linked to marital satisfaction in Chinese marriage. Method Latent profile analysis was conducted using dyadic data from a nationwide large sample of Chinese couples from the China Family Panel Studies ( N = 7,257 couples; M years of marriage = 28.36, SD = 12.84; M age for wives = 52.38, SD = 12.63; M age for husbands = 50.51, SD = 12.37). Results Four profile groups were identified: the “modern female and traditional male” group (MFTM); the “traditional female and modern male” group; the “child‐oriented” group; and the “traditional female and traditional male” group. Husbands’ and wives’ marital satisfaction varied across groups in different patterns (yet all relevant effect sizes were modest). In general, husbands in the congruent group reported higher satisfaction than did those in the incongruent groups, whereas wives in the “MFTM” group reported lower satisfaction than did those in the other groups. Conclusions Such findings shed light on the understudied heterogeneity that inherently exists in the within‐couple patterning of gender‐related attitudes and its implications for marital well‐being in a Chinese cultural context.