Premium
In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments
Author(s) -
GrzechLeśniak Kinga,
Bencharit Sompop,
Dalal Nishchal,
Mroczka Krzysztof,
Deeb Janina Golob
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.13077
Subject(s) - materials science , crown (dentistry) , abutment , titanium , glass ionomer cement , dentistry , implant , dental abutments , er:yag laser , scanning electron microscope , composite material , laser , medicine , metallurgy , engineering , civil engineering , surgery , physics , optics
Purpose Removal of cement‐retained implant crowns can be difficult and often requires sectioning of the prosthesis by rotary instruments. This study aimed to measure how much time is required in crown removal and the temperature changes when erbium‐doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser was used to retrieve lithium disilicate crowns from titanium implant abutments luted with composite resin (CR) cement and resin‐modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods Forty identical lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated for prefabricated titanium abutments. CR and RMGI cements were used to lute the crowns, 20 specimens for each cement. Specimens were kept in 100% humidity for 48 hours. Er:YAG laser was then used to facilitate the crown retrieval. The retrieval time was recorded. The temperature changes at the abutment level for each type of cement were recorded during irradiation of 10 specimens for each type of cement from 1 to 10 minutes. Data were analyzed using t‐test (ɑ = 0.01) and paired t ‐test (ɑ = 0.05). The surfaces of the crown and the abutment were further examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results The average times of crown removal from titanium abutments were 196.5 seconds for CR and 97.5 seconds for RMGI groups with statistical significance ( p < 0.001). The temperatures measured from 1 to 10 minutes of irradiation ranged from 18 ° to 20.8 ° for CR and 18 ° to 23 ° for RMGI at the abutment surface, and 22.1 ° to 24.6 ° for CR and 22 ° to 24.8 ° for RMGI at the crown surface. No statistical differences were observed between temperature changes at the abutment or the crown for each cement ( p = 0.63); however, there was a statistically significant difference between the temperatures at the abutment and crown for both cements ( p < 0.001). SEM examination showed no visible damage caused by treatment with Er:YAG laser. Conclusions It is faster to remove lithium disilicate crowns from titanium implant abutments when luted with RMGI compared to CR cement. The temperature rise was higher in the crown compared to the abutment. The type of cement had no effects on temperature changes. Heat generated from Er:YAG irradiation does not appear to be high enough to have any adverse effect on implant osseointegration.