Premium
Promise of Combining Antifungal Agents in Denture Adhesives to Fight Candida Species Infections
Author(s) -
Garaicoa Jorge L.,
Fischer Carol L.,
Bates Amber M.,
Holloway Julie,
AvilaOrtiz Gustavo,
Guthmiller Janet M.,
Johnson Georgia K.,
Stanford Clark,
Brogden Kim A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.12565
Subject(s) - candida albicans , antimicrobial , nystatin , chlorhexidine , stomatitis , microbiology and biotechnology , adhesive , fluconazole , candida tropicalis , broth microdilution , corpus albicans , minimum inhibitory concentration , antiseptic , antifungal , chemistry , dentistry , biology , medicine , dermatology , organic chemistry , layer (electronics)
Purpose Several complications may arise in patients wearing complete prosthetic appliances, including denture‐associated infections and mucosal stomatitis due to Candida species. This study evaluated the activity of anti‐ Candida agents in denture adhesive and the cytotoxicities of these preparations for primary human gingival epithelial (GE) keratinocytes. Materials and Methods The anti‐ Candida activities of antimicrobial peptides, antimicrobial lipids, and antifungal agents against C. albicans ATCC 64124 or HMV4C were assessed in microdilution assays containing water or 1% denture adhesive. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and the minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were determined. The cytotoxicities of denture adhesive compounded with these agents were assessed in 1.0 × 10 5 primary GE keratinocytes in LGM‐3 media with resazurin. Results Lactoferricin B, SMAP28, sphingosine, dihydrosphingosine, and phytosphingosine in 1% denture adhesive lost antimicrobial activity for C. albicans ( p < 0.05). Amphotericin B, chlorhexidine dihydrochloride, chlorhexidine gluconate, fluconazole, and nystatin in 1% denture adhesive or compounded directly into denture adhesive and then diluted to 1% adhesive, did not lose antimicrobial activity. Compounded formulations were not cytotoxic (LD 50 > 100.0 μg/ml) against primary human GE keratinocytes. Conclusions Antimicrobial peptides and antimicrobial lipids had diminished activities in 1% adhesive, suggesting that components in adhesives may inactivate local innate immune factors in the oral cavity, possibly predisposing denture wearers to Candida species infections. More importantly, antifungal agents retained their anti‐ C. albicans activities in denture adhesive, strongly suggesting that antifungal agents could be candidates for inclusion in adhesive formulations and used as prescribed topical treatments for individuals with denture stomatitis.