z-logo
Premium
Influence of Cement Type and Relining Procedure on Push‐Out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts after Cyclic Loading
Author(s) -
Farina Ana Paula,
Chiela Henrique,
CarliniJunior Bruno,
Mesquita Marcelo Ferraz,
Miyagaki Daniela Cristina,
Randi Ferraz Caio Cezar,
Vidal Cristina Mattos Pimenta,
Cecchin Doglas
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.12271
Subject(s) - bond strength , materials science , cement , dentin , dentistry , composite material , orthodontics , adhesive , medicine , layer (electronics)
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of cement type and relining procedure on push‐out bond strength of fiber posts (FPs) after cyclic loading. Materials and Methods Forty bovine incisor roots were divided into four groups: group 1, FP luting with RelyX Unicem; group 2, FP relined with resin composite (FPC) luting with RelyX Unicem; group 3, FP luting with RelyX ARC; group 4, FPC luting with RelyX ARC. Afterwards, half the specimens were exposed to 250,000 cycles in a controlled chewing simulator. With the other half of the specimens in each group, the push‐out test was performed 24 hours after FP luting (immediate groups). All roots were sectioned transversely, producing 1‐mm‐thick slices, and the push‐out test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the Tukey test for post hoc comparisons (α = 0.05). Results FPC had higher bond strengths than FP ( p < 0.05). RelyX Unicem showed higher bond strength than RelyX ARC ( p < 0.05). Cyclic loading did not significantly affect the bond strength value ( p > 0.05). Conclusion The relining procedure and the cement type are important factors for the bond strength of FPs to root dentin.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here