z-logo
Premium
A Randomized Trial on Simplified and Conventional Methods for Complete Denture Fabrication: Cost Analysis
Author(s) -
Vecchia Maria Paula Della,
Regis Rômulo Rocha,
Cunha Tatiana Ramirez,
Andrade Ingrid Machado,
Matta Julio César Souza,
Souza Raphael Freitas
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.12090
Subject(s) - dentures , dentistry , medicine , protocol (science) , fabrication , orthodontics , randomized controlled trial , significant difference , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
Purpose This study aimed to quantify the costs of complete denture fabrication by a simplified method compared with a conventional protocol. Materials and Methods A sample of edentulous patients needing conventional maxillary and mandibular complete dentures was randomly divided into group S, which received dentures fabricated by a simplified method, and group C, which received conventionally fabricated dentures. We calculated direct and indirect costs for each participant including unscheduled procedures. This study assessed 19 and 20 participants allocated into groups S and C, respectively, and comparisons between groups were conducted by the Mann‐Whitney and Student's t ‐test (α = 0.05). Results Complete denture fabrication demanded median time periods of 173.2 and 284.5 minutes from the operator for groups S and C respectively, and 46.6 and 61.7 minutes from the dental assistant (significant differences, p < 0.05). There was no difference between groups regarding postinsertion adjustments. Group S showed lower values for costs with materials and time spent by patients than group C during the fabrication stage, but not during adjustments. Conclusions The median direct cost of complete denture treatment was 34.9% lower for the simplified method. It can be concluded that the simplified method is less costly for patients and the health system when compared with a conventional protocol for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here