Premium
Accuracy of Ringless Casting and Accelerated Wax‐Elimination Technique: A Comparative In Vitro Study
Author(s) -
Prasad Rahul,
AlKeraif Abdulaziz Abdullah,
Kathuria Nidhi,
Gandhi P.V.,
Bhide S.V.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.12082
Subject(s) - wax , materials science , casting , magnification , investment casting , metallurgy , biomedical engineering , composite material , medicine , computer science , mold , computer vision
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether the ringless casting and accelerated wax‐elimination techniques can be combined to offer a cost‐effective, clinically acceptable, and time‐saving alternative for fabricating single unit castings in fixed prosthodontics. Materials and Methods Sixty standardized wax copings were fabricated on a type IV stone replica of a stainless steel die. The wax patterns were divided into four groups. The first group was cast using the ringless investment technique and conventional wax‐elimination method; the second group was cast using the ringless investment technique and accelerated wax‐elimination method; the third group was cast using the conventional metal ring investment technique and conventional wax‐elimination method; the fourth group was cast using the metal ring investment technique and accelerated wax‐elimination method. The vertical marginal gap was measured at four sites per specimen, using a digital optical microscope at 100× magnification. The results were analyzed using two‐way ANOVA to determine statistical significance. Results The vertical marginal gaps of castings fabricated using the ringless technique (76.98 ± 7.59 μm) were significantly less ( p < 0.05) than those castings fabricated using the conventional metal ring technique (138.44 ± 28.59 μm); however, the vertical marginal gaps of the conventional (102.63 ± 36.12 μm) and accelerated wax‐elimination (112.79 ± 38.34 μm) castings were not statistically significant ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The ringless investment technique can produce castings with higher accuracy and can be favorably combined with the accelerated wax‐elimination method as a vital alternative to the time‐consuming conventional technique of casting restorations in fixed prosthodontics.