Premium
Effect of Chemical and Microwave Disinfection on the Surface Microhardness of Acrylic Resin Denture Teeth
Author(s) -
Vasconcelos Ligia Regina,
Consani Rafael Leonardo Xediek,
Mesquita Marcelo Ferraz,
Sinhoreti Mário Alexandre Coelho
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/jopr.12009
Subject(s) - sodium hypochlorite , distilled water , knoop hardness test , indentation hardness , acrylic resin , materials science , hardness , dentistry , microwave oven , acicular , hypochlorite , composite material , microwave , chemistry , medicine , microstructure , chromatography , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , coating
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of simulated disinfections (2% glutaraldehyde, 1% sodium hypochlorite, and microwave energy) on the surface hardness of Trilux, Biocler, Biotone, New Ace, and Magister commercial artificial teeth. Materials and Methods Specimens (n = 10) were made with the teeth included individually in circular blocks of acrylic resin, leaving the labial surface exposed. Cycles of simulated chemical disinfection were accomplished with the specimens immersed in the solutions at room temperature for 10 minutes, followed by tap water washing for 30 seconds and storage in distilled water at room temperature for 7 days until the next disinfection. Simulated disinfection by microwave energy was carried out in a domestic oven with 1300 W at a potency of 50% for 3 minutes with the specimens individually immersed in 150 ml of distilled water. Control (no disinfection) and the experimental groups (first and third disinfection cycles) were submitted to Knoop hardness measurements with indentations at the center of the labial tooth surface. Data were submitted to repeated measure two‐way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results Biocler, Magister, and Trilux showed lower surface microhardness when submitted to microwave. Lower microhardness for Biotone was promoted by hypochlorite, while no significant difference was shown for New Ace. The third disinfection cycle significantly decreased the tooth surface hardness only for microwave. Conclusions Different disinfection methods promoted different effects on the microhardness of different types of artificial teeth. Surface microhardness of the teeth was less affected by the simulated chemical disinfections when compared to microwaved specimens.