z-logo
Premium
Content and construct validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I for children
Author(s) -
Restrepo Claudia C.,
Suarez Natasha,
Moratto Nadia,
Manrique Rubén
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/joor.12957
Subject(s) - construct validity , construct (python library) , content validity , psychology , medicine , clinical psychology , computer science , psychometrics , programming language
Objective To perform the content and construct validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I, for children 7‐11 years old. Materials and Methods A Delphi process was used to perform the content validity of the DC/TMD Axis I. One hundred eighty‐nine 7‐ to 11‐year‐old children were assessed with the adapted instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to investigate construct validity of the DC/TMD for children. A baseline one‐factor model was compared against a two‐factor (Model 2) and a seven‐factor (Model 3) models based on the original DC/TMD. Root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), chi‐square, change in chi‐square and Cronbach's α were used to analyse the data. All analyses were performed in STATA © version 13.0. Results Items of the DC/TMD were reduced, “history time” was changed to 2 weeks, pain intensity was assessed through a face scale, and language was adapted to be better understood by children. The amount of muscle pressure was maintained as in the original DC/TMD Axis I. The CFA led to a two‐ and a seven‐factor model, with good fit. The internal consistency of Model 2 was .91 and of Model 3, .94. Conclusion The results of this study provide evidence to support a seven‐factor representation of the DC/TMD Axis I for 7‐ to 11‐year‐old children, as well as a two‐factor structure. Such findings will begin to provide researchers with confidence in the properties of this instrument when considering its inclusion in clinical research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here