Premium
Effect of sleep restriction on somatosensory sensitivity in the oro‐facial area: An experimental controlled study
Author(s) -
Kamiyama Hirona,
Iida Takashi,
Nishimori Hideta,
Kubo Hideyuki,
Uchiyama Makoto,
De Laat Antoon,
Lavigne Gilles,
Komiyama Osamu
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/joor.12758
Subject(s) - somatosensory system , audiology , quantitative sensory testing , tongue , thumb , crossover study , medicine , sleep restriction , epworth sleepiness scale , repeated measures design , analysis of variance , sensory system , psychology , anesthesia , physical therapy , sleep deprivation , polysomnography , circadian rhythm , surgery , mathematics , neuroscience , statistics , alternative medicine , apnea , pathology , placebo
Summary Background No studies have addressed the effect of SR on somatosensory function in the oro‐facial area. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sleep restriction (SR) on the somatosensory perception of the tip of the tongue. Materials and Methods Using a crossover study design, 13 healthy participants took part in a random order, to a two arms experiments: the SR and control/no SR‐arms. For all participants, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was used to assess sleepiness and mechanical sensitivity, and pain detection threshold was estimated at the tongue tip and right thumb (as a body area control site). In the SR‐arm of the study, on day one, we estimated sensory baseline perception and repeated tests on day two, after a night of voluntary SR, and on day 3, after a recovery night. In the second arm, same sensory tests were done but no SR was requested. Results Significantly more sleepiness was observed after SR in comparison with baseline and recovery testing days ( P < 0.05). After SR, mechanical pain threshold on the tip of the tongue was significantly lower on day after SR (day 2) and a rebound, higher values, were observed on the third day ( P < 0.05); no difference on thumb site. In the control arm, no SR and no significant differences between days were observed for all the variables of interest. Conclusions The present results suggest that SR may affect somatosensory perception in the oro‐facial area.