Premium
Defensive decision making: Operationalization and the relevance of psychological safety and job insecurity from a conservation of resources perspective
Author(s) -
MarxFleck Stefanie,
Junker Nina M.,
Artinger Florian,
Dick Rolf
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of occupational and organizational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 2044-8325
pISSN - 0963-1798
DOI - 10.1111/joop.12353
Subject(s) - operationalization , situational ethics , psychology , relevance (law) , scale (ratio) , social psychology , perspective (graphical) , conservation of resources theory , resource (disambiguation) , computer science , computer network , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , political science , law
Defensive decision making occurs when the decision‐maker does not choose the option that is in the best interest of an organization or client but instead chooses a less effective but lower risk alternative that protects him or her in case something goes wrong. Such decisions are widespread across occupations and sectors and cause substantive damage to organizations. In a first step, we developed a scale to measure defensive decision making and test its validity. The scale covers two distinct but related dimensions: avoidance and approach. In a subsequent, two‐wave study, we examined the antecedents of defensive decision making using conservation of resources theory as a theoretical lens. An environment characterized by higher psychological safety can reduce resource depletion and diminishes defensive decision making. In contrast, job insecurity can result in a threat to personal resources, which increases the likelihood that employees choose defensive decisions. Practitioners points People engage in defensive decision making as a means to protect their own resources from exhaustion. Organizations can reduce the number of defensive decisions by enhancing situational resources such as psychological safety. The short and preliminarily validated scale we developed can be used to make defensive decisions visible in organizations.