Premium
The predictive validity of charge nurse personality on objective and subjective performance of subordinates
Author(s) -
Gottlieb Troels,
GøtzscheAstrup Oluf
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of nursing management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1365-2834
pISSN - 0966-0429
DOI - 10.1111/jonm.12696
Subject(s) - conscientiousness , psychology , extraversion and introversion , personality , nursing management , big five personality traits , personality assessment inventory , clinical psychology , social psychology , applied psychology , nursing , medicine
Aim This study examines the degree to which the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) predicts leadership effectiveness for charge nurses in Danish hospitals. Background Personality tests are implemented in health care management in an effort to improve evidence‐based personnel selection and recruit more efficient leaders. However, relatively few studies of the predictive validity of personality have been conducted in hospital management. Methods Charge nurses ( n = 177) from three Danish hospitals completed a five‐factor, model‐based personality inventory. These were coupled with data from 3,497 subordinates. Cluster‐robust regression analysis was used to investigate relationships between personality and short‐term sickness absence and satisfaction and leadership ratings for the subordinates. Results Low subordinate sickness absence was related to leader extraversion and conscientiousness. Employee satisfaction was related to leader emotional stability, extraversion, and conscientiousness. Leadership ratings were associated with emotional stability. Conclusions Personality predicted both objective and subjective measures of performance, although the effects were stronger for objective than subjective measures. Implications for Nursing Management The results lend support to the use of validated personality measures in recruiting and promoting nurses in the health care sector. The use of personality tests should support rather than replace other talent‐management measures.