Premium
A systematic review: barriers to hourly rounding
Author(s) -
Toole Nicole,
Meluskey Tamara,
Hall Norma
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of nursing management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1365-2834
pISSN - 0966-0429
DOI - 10.1111/jonm.12332
Subject(s) - rounding , workload , limiting , inclusion (mineral) , nursing , staffing , process (computing) , medicine , computer science , psychology , engineering , social psychology , operating system , mechanical engineering
Aim The purpose of this review of the literature is to identify a comprehensive list of the barriers that impact the effective implementation and sustainment of hourly rounding on the adult inpatient medical or surgical unit. Background Despite the benefits associated with hourly rounding, challenges with the implementation and sustainment of this intervention have been reported on medical‐surgical units. Some hospitals have multiple campaigns to implement rounding, yet sustainment eludes them. Evaluation Four databases were searched independently by two reviewers. Articles were screened according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and 20 articles resulted. Key issues Clear themes of barriers emerged across the literature consisting of: workload issues, burdensome rounding logs, missing staff buy‐in, patient acuity levels, lack of adequate staff education and a lack of sustainability. Conclusions The barriers identified are all directly related and perceived by the front line staff that is performing hourly rounding. The barriers identified may be limiting the organisation's ability to sustain the hourly rounding process. Implications for nursing management Leaders can utilise this information to analyse and create successful options to overcome these barriers before, during and after the implementation process. Further studies are needed to identify targeted strategies to alleviate these barriers.