Premium
Reliability, Asymmetry, and Age Influence on Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measured by Spontaneous Fluctuations of Blood Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocities in Healthy Individuals
Author(s) -
OrtegaGutierrez Santiago,
Petersen Nils,
Masurkar Arjun,
Reccius Andres,
Huang Amy,
Li Min,
Choi Jae H.,
Marshall Randolph S.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of neuroimaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1552-6569
pISSN - 1051-2284
DOI - 10.1111/jon.12019
Subject(s) - intraclass correlation , medicine , cerebral blood flow , cerebral autoregulation , correlation , cardiology , bivariate analysis , blood pressure , reliability (semiconductor) , autoregulation , nuclear medicine , statistics , mathematics , psychometrics , clinical psychology , power (physics) , physics , geometry , quantum mechanics
BACKGROUND Cerebral autoregulation (CA) enables the brain to maintain stable cerebral blood flow (CBF). CA can be assessed noninvasively by determining correlations between CBF velocity (CBFV) and spontaneous changes in blood pressure. Postrecording signal analysis methods have included both frequency‐ and time‐domain methods. However, the test‐retest reliability, cross‐validation, and determination of normal values have not been adequately established. METHODS In 53 healthy volunteers, a transfer function analysis was applied to calculate phase shift (PS) and gain in the low frequency range (.06‐.12 Hz) where CA is most apparent. Correlation analysis was used to derive mean velocity index (Mx). Intraclass correlation and bivariate correlation coefficients were applied to assess asymmetry, cross‐validity, and test‐retest results: The bihemispheric average PS, gain, and Mx means were 45.99+/−14.24°, .62+/−.38 cm/second/mmHg, and .41+/−.13, respectively. Gain exhibited a difference by age ( P = .03). PS, gain, and Mx values showed excellent interhemispheric correlation ( r > .8; P < .001). PS and gain showed good reliability ( R ICC = .632, L ICC = .576; P < .001). PS and Mx showed fair correlation ( r = −.37; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS CA parameters obtained by time‐ and frequency‐domain methods correlate well, and show good interhemispheric and test‐retest reliability. Group means from healthy controls may provide adequate norms for determining abnormal CA in cerebrovascular patients.