z-logo
Premium
(Non‐)Insurance Markets, Loss Size Manipulation and Competition: Experimental Evidence*
Author(s) -
Hinloopen Jeroen,
Soetevent Adriaan R.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of industrial economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.93
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1467-6451
pISSN - 0022-1821
DOI - 10.1111/joie.12246
Subject(s) - competition (biology) , market power , business , microeconomics , auto insurance risk selection , power (physics) , actuarial science , economics , key person insurance , insurance policy , monopoly , ecology , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
The common view that insurer buyer power may effectively counteract provider market power critically rests on the idea that consumers and insurers have a joint interest in pushing for price and cost reductions. We develop theory and provide experimental evidence that the interests of insurers and consumers may be misaligned when insurers have the power to influence the service supplier’s cost. Insurers with such buyer power may benefit from increasing initial loss sizes to create demand for insurance. Insurer competition eliminates their profits but markets do not return to the initial non‐insurance state. This constitutes a welfare loss.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here