Open AccessThe impact of atrial fibrillation on transcatheter mitral valve repair outcomes: A propensity‐matched analysis
Author(s) -
Subahi Ahmed,
Munir Ahmad,
Abubakar Hossam,
Akintoye Emmanuel,
Yassin Ahmed S.,
Adegbala Oluwole,
Alraies Mohamed Chadi,
Elder Mahir,
Mohamad Tamam,
Kaki Amir,
Schreiber Theodore
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of interventional cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.764
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1540-8183
pISSN - 0896-4327
DOI - 10.1111/joic.12568
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , propensity score matching , concomitant , odds ratio , mitraclip , cardiology , mitral valve
Background The concomitant presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair (TMVR) represents a clinical challenge. Despite the high AF burden in patients presenting for the TMVR procedure, there are no studies that evaluate the impact of AF on in‐hospital outcomes of TMVR in a nationally representative United States sample reflecting real practice. Therefore, we sought to study the outcomes of AF patients undergoing TMVR. Methods and Results The study included 1026 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) registry. Patients (age ≥18 years) who had undergone TAVR as a primary procedure from 2011 to 2014 were included, using the ICD‐9‐CM diagnostic codes. We examined patient characteristics and in‐hospital outcomes. To account for patient and hospital‐level baseline differences, we performed propensity score‐matched analysis. The prevalence of AF was approximately 56%. After adjusting for patient‐level and hospital‐level characteristics, there was no statistical difference regarding in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95%CI 0.29‐1.80, P = 0.487), post‐TMVR complications, length of stay (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.97‐1.38, P = 0.111), and cost of hospitalization (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.94‐1.14, P = 0.475) between the group with AF versus without AF. However, patients with AF were more likely to have non‐routine hospital discharge (42.94% vs 35.48% P = 0.02). Conclusion AF is a frequently encountered arrhythmia among patients undergoing TMVR with MitraClip. However, TMVR can be performed safely in the vast majority of patients, irrespective of their baseline rhythm.