z-logo
Premium
How Do Intergroup Grievances Develop in the Absence of Oppression? Revolutions and Political Parties in Nineteenth‐Century U ruguay
Author(s) -
Somma Nicolás M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of historical sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.186
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1467-6443
pISSN - 0952-1909
DOI - 10.1111/johs.12046
Subject(s) - oppression , politics , perspective (graphical) , political economy , political science , political mobilization , incentive , order (exchange) , sociology , law , economics , artificial intelligence , computer science , microeconomics , finance
Political sociologists often assume that widespread grievances require a long legacy of intergroup oppression. Yet in nineteenth‐century U ruguay, supporters of the W hite and R ed political parties developed intense grievances against each other even though a legacy of oppression was missing. For explaining this puzzle I present an alternative perspective. It states that grievances first originate among political elites, which mobilize the masses through selective incentives in order to impose their will. If elites and masses are bound by close ties, sustained mobilization facilitates cross‐class group identification and allows grievances to “trickle down” from the top to the bottom of the social structure.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here