Premium
Psychological stress among pregnant and puerperal women in Japan during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
Author(s) -
Obata Soichiro,
Miyagi Etsuko,
Haruyama Yasuo,
Umazume Takeshi,
Kobashi Gen,
Yoshimi Asuka,
Hishimoto Akitoyo,
Kurasawa Kentaro,
Suzuki Yukio,
Ikeda Tomoaki,
Kimura Tadashi,
Yamada Hideto
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1447-0756
pISSN - 1341-8076
DOI - 10.1111/jog.14877
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , pregnancy , anxiety , confidence interval , logistic regression , edinburgh postnatal depression scale , depression (economics) , obstetrics , cross sectional study , demography , psychiatry , depressive symptoms , genetics , macroeconomics , pathology , sociology , economics , biology
Aim To evaluate psychological stress among pregnant and puerperal women in Japan during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, we recruited pregnant women and puerperal women who delivered between January and September 2020 in Japan, using an online questionnaire. Participants were divided into low, middle, and high groups according to the degree of the epidemic in their region of residence. Related factors were analyzed using the chi‐squared test. The relationship between COVID‐19 epidemic regions and depression risks and anxiety using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Kessler 6 scale (K6) was evaluated using a univariate and multivariable logistic regression model. Results Overall, 7775 cases, including 4798 pregnant and 2977 puerperal women, were analyzed. The prevalence of high EPDS and K6 scores was significantly increased in pregnant women in the high than those in the low epidemic regions (EPDS: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.453, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.205–1.753; K6: aOR 1.601, 95% CI 1.338–1.918). There was no difference in EPDS score, but the prevalence of high K6 scores was significantly increased in puerperal women in the high than those in the low epidemic regions (aOR 1.342, 95% CI 1.066–1.690). Further, restriction on going to their hometown for delivery increased the prevalence of high EPDS scores among pregnant (aOR 1.663, 95% CI 1.296–2.133) and puerperal women (aOR 1.604, 95% CI 1.006–2.557). Conclusions Decreased support due to the COVID‐19 pandemic affected the psychological status of pregnant and puerperal women; hence, investing medical resources in their healthcare essential.