Premium
Analysis of risk factors for patients with early‐stage cervical cancer: A study of 374 patients
Author(s) -
Ueda Kazu,
Yanaihara Nozomu,
Iida Yasushi,
Kobayashi Ritsuko,
Kato Sayako,
Matsuda Yuna,
Tomita Keisuke,
Yamamura Nami,
Saito Ryosuke,
Hirose Sou,
Kuroda Takafumi,
Seki Toshiyuki,
Saito Motoaki,
Takano Hirokuni,
Yamada Kyosuke,
Okamoto Aikou
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1447-0756
pISSN - 1341-8076
DOI - 10.1111/jog.14510
Subject(s) - medicine , stage (stratigraphy) , cervical cancer , hazard ratio , radical hysterectomy , proportional hazards model , oncology , adenocarcinoma , adenosquamous carcinoma , cancer , retrospective cohort study , survival analysis , confidence interval , paleontology , biology
Aim This study aimed to identify the postoperative histological features affecting the prognosis of patients with early‐stage cervical cancer who underwent open radical hysterectomy. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 374 patients with pT1a, 1b1 and 2a1 early‐stage cervical cancer who underwent open radical hysterectomy between 2001 and 2018. Survival outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log‐rank test. Using the Cox proportional hazards regression test, we conducted a multivariate analysis for disease‐free survival and overall survival. Results Others histology, including other epithelial tumors and neuroendocrine tumors, had a significantly worse prognosis in both disease‐free survival and overall survival than those of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio, 4.37 and 11.76; P = 0.006 and P = 0.002, respectively), along with lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio, 2.99 and 7.03; P = 0.009 and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Others histology including adenosquamous carcinoma had a poor prognosis in early‐stage cervical cancer as with high‐risk factors.