Premium
Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10‐group classification system
Author(s) -
Tan Jarrod Kah Hwee,
Tan Eng Loy,
Kanagalingam Devendra,
Yu Su Ling,
Tan Lay Kok
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1447-0756
pISSN - 1341-8076
DOI - 10.1111/jog.13032
Subject(s) - medicine , in vitro fertilisation , obstetrics , pregnancy , gynecology , human fertilization , andrology , anatomy , genetics , biology
Aim In vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy is an important contributor to rising cesarean section (CS) rates. The profile of CS in this group is not well documented. This study sought to identify leading patient categories of the Robson 10‐Group Classification System (TGCS) contributing to the high IVF CS rate. Methods We carried out a prospective study of IVF patients who delivered in the Singapore General Hospital from January 2010 to July 2012. Parity, singleton/multiple pregnancy, previous CS, mode of labor onset and gestational age at delivery were collected based on the TGCS. All other deliveries during the study period served as control. Results There were a total of 215 IVF deliveries, of which 114 (54.4%) were CS. Group 8 (all multiple pregnancies) was the greatest contributor to the overall CS rate (43.0%). Group 2 (term nulliparous singleton cephalic pregnancies with induction of labor or planned CS) was the second largest contributor to overall CS rate (12.3%). The third and fourth leading contributors were Group 10 (preterm singleton pregnancies) and Group 5 (pregnancies with previous CS), respectively. In contrast, these two groups were top contributors to the overall CS rate for the control group. Conclusion Multiple pregnancy is the principal contributor to CS in our IVF population, and reducing its incidence may reduce its CS rate. Among singleton pregnancies, planned CS and failed induction for cephalic term pregnancies and preterm singleton pregnancies were the next largest contributors, suggesting a higher prevalence of maternal request and high‐risk obstetric indications requiring interventions at preterm gestations.