z-logo
Premium
Option Mispricing around Nontrading Periods
Author(s) -
JONES CHRISTOPHER S.,
SHEMESH JOSHUA
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 18.151
H-Index - 299
eISSN - 1540-6261
pISSN - 0022-1082
DOI - 10.1111/jofi.12603
Subject(s) - economics , variance (accounting) , stock (firearms) , econometrics , financial economics , stock options , market efficiency , finance , accounting , mechanical engineering , engineering
We find that option returns are significantly lower over nontrading periods, the vast majority of which are weekends. Our evidence suggests that nontrading returns cannot be explained by risk, but rather are the result of widespread and highly persistent option mispricing driven by the incorrect treatment of stock return variance during periods of market closure. The size of the effect implies that the broad spectrum of finance research involving option prices should account for nontrading effects. Our study further suggests how alternative industry practices could improve the efficiency of option markets in a meaningful way.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here