Premium
Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?
Author(s) -
MCLEAN R. DAVID,
PONTIFF JEFFREY
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the journal of finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 18.151
H-Index - 299
eISSN - 1540-6261
pISSN - 0022-1082
DOI - 10.1111/jofi.12365
Subject(s) - predictability , market liquidity , portfolio , stock (firearms) , econometrics , economics , sample (material) , financial economics , actuarial science , business , monetary economics , statistics , mathematics , geography , chemistry , archaeology , chromatography
We study the out‐of‐sample and post‐publication return predictability of 97 variables shown to predict cross‐sectional stock returns. Portfolio returns are 26% lower out‐of‐sample and 58% lower post‐publication. The out‐of‐sample decline is an upper bound estimate of data mining effects. We estimate a 32% (58%–26%) lower return from publication‐informed trading. Post‐publication declines are greater for predictors with higher in‐sample returns, and returns are higher for portfolios concentrated in stocks with high idiosyncratic risk and low liquidity. Predictor portfolios exhibit post‐publication increases in correlations with other published‐predictor portfolios. Our findings suggest that investors learn about mispricing from academic publications.