Premium
Outcomes in minimally invasive double valve surgery
Author(s) -
Brown Louise J.,
Mellor Sophie L.,
Niranjan Gunaratnam,
Harky Amer
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/jocs.14997
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , randomized controlled trial , surgery , cardiopulmonary bypass , invasive surgery , mortality rate , cohort , intensive care medicine , cardiology
Objective To review current literature evidence on outcomes of minimally invasive double valve surgeries (MIS). Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was done from inception to 20th June 2020 identifying articles that discussed outcomes of minimally invasive approach in double valve surgeries either as a solo cohort or as comparative to conventional sternotomies. No limit was placed on time and place of publication and the evidence has been summarized in narrative manner within the manuscript. Results Majority of current literature reported similar perioperative and clinical outcomes between MIS and conventional median sternotomy; except that MIS has better cosmetic effects and pain control. Nevertheless, minimal invasive techniques are associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross‐clamp times which may have impact on the reported outcomes and overall morbidity and mortality rates. Conclusion Minimally invasive double valve surgery continues to develop, but scarcity in the literature suggests uptake is slow, possibly due to the learning curve associated with MIS. Many outcomes appear to be comparable to conventional sternotomy. There is need for larger, multi‐center, and randomized trial to fully evaluate and establish the early, mid‐ and long‐term morbidity and mortality rates associated with both techniques.