Premium
Multi‐arterial and total‐arterial coronary revascularization: Past, present, and future perspective
Author(s) -
Torregrossa Gianluca,
Amabile Andrea,
Williams Elbert E.,
Fonceva Ana,
Hosseinian Leila,
Balkhy Husam H.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/jocs.14537
Subject(s) - medicine , bypass grafting , internal thoracic artery , revascularization , artery , medline , perspective (graphical) , cardiology , myocardial revascularization , intensive care medicine , myocardial infarction , artificial intelligence , computer science , political science , law
Background and Aim of the Study Although abundant biological, clinical, and scientific evidence exists on the superiority of multi‐arterial (MAR) and total‐arterial revascularization (TAR) over the conventional strategy with a single internal thoracic artery, only 10% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the United States receives a second arterial conduit, and only 5% of patients receives TAR. Methods and Results In January 2020, the authors performed comprehensive search to identify studies that evaluated MAR and TAR strategies through the MEDLINE database. Conclusions In this paper, the authors reviewed the literature on the historical and current evidence in favor of MAR and TAR, thus underlying why current CABG practice needs qualitative improvement.