Premium
Permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak rates following sutureless aortic valve operations
Author(s) -
Lazkani Mohamad,
Yerasi Charan,
Prakash Sheena,
Pershad Ashish,
Fang Kenith
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/jocs.13938
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , meta analysis , aortic valve replacement , stroke (engine) , cardiology , incidence (geometry) , prosthesis , coronary artery disease , surgery , mechanical engineering , physics , optics , stenosis , engineering
Background Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and paravalvular leak (PVL) rates after sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) vary widely. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to examine the incidence of new PPM implantation and PVL after SuAVR. Methods Studies evaluating PPM implantation and PVL rates after SuAVR were searched in Medline/PubMed, Ovid Journals, Clinicaltrials.gov , Cochrane central register of controlled trials and database. Studies with a sample size ≥10 were included in this analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated using both the fixed and random‐effects models. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using I 2 statistic. The study design was written in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results Thirty studies involving 3993 patients with a median follow‐up of 12 months were included. The median age was 77 years and males constituted 50%. There was a history of stroke and coronary artery disease in 6% and 31% of the population. Pooled proportions demonstrate a cumulative postoperative PPM rate of 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6‐9.5%, I 2 = 68.8%) and the overall rate of any PVL was 4.2% (95%CI 3.4‐5%, I 2 = 76.1%) across all major SuAVR devices. The rate of severe PVL was only 0.4% (95%CI 0.2‐0.7%, I 2 = 0%) at discharge and 0.5% (95%CI 0.2‐0.9%, I 2 = 0%) at 12 months. Conclusions In SuAVR prostheses implanted in this meta‐analysis, the postoperative permanent pacemaker rate was higher (8.5%) than reported for non‐SuAVR prosthesis. While the overall PVL rate was 4.2%, the incidence of severe PVL was only 0.4% at discharge and remained stable at 0.5% at 12 months.