z-logo
Premium
Sutureless Valve Implantation in Sievers Type 0 Bicuspid Annuli: A Word of Caution
Author(s) -
Vola Marco,
Guichard JeanBaptiste,
Fuzellier JeanFrançois,
Haber Benjamain,
Campisi Salvatore,
Gerbay Antoine,
Ruggieri Vito Giovanni
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/jocs.12599
Subject(s) - medicine , bicuspid aortic valve , prosthesis , ventricle , perioperative , cardiac skeleton , bicuspid valve , surgery , aortic valve , aortic valve replacement , stenosis
A BSTRACT Aim We describe a series of 3f Enable sutureless prostheses implanted in bicuspid valves. Methods Between March 2011 and April 2014, five patients with Sievers type 0 bicuspid valves were selected to receive the sutureless 3f Enable prosthesis . Exclusion criteria were: intraoperative calibration of the aortic annulus >27 mm, left ventricle ejection fraction <50%, age <70 years. Results All the implantations could be performed without the necessity to re‐deploy the prosthesis . The perioperative transesophageal echocardiogragram detected two moderate paravalvular leakages (PVL) in two patients who received a large size of prosthesis (25 and 27 mm, respectively). The two leakages, at a follow‐up of 32 and 24 months, respectively, increased to grade II and II +. No PVL appeared in the other three patients. Conclusion This experience should warn about the inadequate performance of the 3f Enable valve in Sievers type 0 large aortic bicuspid annuli. In this subset any minor intraoperative residual leakage should not be accepted. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12599 (J Card Surg 2015;30:694–696)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom