Premium
Valve Cuspidity: A Risk Factor for Aortic Valve Repair?
Author(s) -
Holubec Tomas,
Zacek Pavel,
Jamaliramin Mostafa,
Emmert Maxmilian Y.,
Tuna Martin,
Nedbal Pavel,
Dominik Jan,
Harrer Jan,
Falk Volkmar,
Vojacek Jan
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/jocs.12382
Subject(s) - medicine , bicuspid aortic valve , regurgitation (circulation) , cardiology , aortic valve , ascending aorta , bicuspid valve , surgery , aorta
Background The aim of this study was to analyze short‐ and mid‐term results after aortic valve (AV) repair with particular regard to the impact of valve cuspidity (bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve). Methods One hundred patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing aortic valve repair between November 2007 and October 2012 were included in the study. Sixty patients had bicuspid AV (BAV group; 11 females) and 40 patients had tricuspid AV (TAV group; 13 females). AR > grade 2 was present in 47 (78%) patients in the BAV and in 35 (88%) patients in the TAV group. Follow‐up was complete in 100% and median was 25 months. Results Isolated aortic valve repair was performed in 27 (45%) of BAV patients and in six (15%) of TAV patients. Replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic root was performed in 33 (55%) of BAV patients and in 34 (86%) of TAV patients. There was no death within 30 days postoperatively, while two patients died (TAV group) during the follow‐up period. There was no statistical difference between BAV and TAV groups with regard to the survival (100 ± 0% vs. 95 ± 4%, p = 0.102), the three‐year freedom from AV‐related reoperation (90 ± 5% vs. 89 ± 6%, p = 0.456), and the three‐year freedom from AR grade > 2 (86 ± 6% vs. 82 ± 7%, p = 0.866), respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrates no difference in mid‐term results after regurgitant bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair, suggesting that bicuspid valve may not be a risk factor for aortic valve repair. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12382 (J Card Surg 2014;29:585–592)