Premium
Theorising survivorship after intensive care: A systematic review of patient and family experiences
Author(s) -
Kean Susanne,
Donaghy Eddie,
Bancroft Angus,
Clegg Gareth,
Rodgers Sheila
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.15766
Subject(s) - survivorship curve , context (archaeology) , systematic review , checklist , health care , medicine , psychology , medline , nursing , cancer , cognitive psychology , biology , paleontology , political science , law , economics , economic growth
Abstract Aims and Objective This systematic literature review explores and maps what we know about survivorship to understand how survivorship can be theoretically defined. Background Survivorship of critical illness has been identified as a challenge for the 21st Century. Whilst the use of the term ‘survivorship’ is now common in critical care, it has been borrowed from the cancer literature where the discourse on what survivorship means in a cancer context is ongoing and remains largely descriptive. In the absence of a theoretical understanding, the term ‘survivorship’ is often used in critical illness in a generic way, limiting our understanding of what survivorship is. The current COVID‐19 pandemic adds to an urgency of understanding what intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship might mean, given the emerging long‐term consequences of this patient cohort. We set out to explore how survivorship after critical illness is being conceptualised and what the implications might be for clinical practice and research. Design Integrated systematic literature review. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PRISMA guidelines were followed and a PRISMA checklist for reporting systematic reviews completed. Results The three main themes around which the reviewed studies were organised are: (a) healthcare system; (b) ICU survivors’ families; and (c) ICU survivor's identity. These three themes feed into an overarching core theme of ‘ICU Survivorship Experiences’. These themes map our current knowledge of what happens when a patient survives a critical illness and where we are in understanding ICU survivorship. Conclusion We mapped in this systematic review the different pieces of the jigsaw that emerge following critical illness to understand and see the bigger picture of what happens after patients survive critical illness. It is evident that existing research has mapped these connections, but what we have not managed to do yet is defining what survivorship is theoretically. We offer a preliminary definition of survivorship as a process but are aware that this definition needs to be developed further with patients and families.