Premium
“It is still intense and not unambiguous.” Nurses' experiences in the euthanasia care process 15 years after legalisation
Author(s) -
Bellens Marthe,
Debien Elisa,
Claessens Fien,
Gastmans Chris,
Dierckx de Casterlé Bernadette
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.15110
Subject(s) - snowball sampling , feeling , flemish , ambivalence , grounded theory , nursing , nonprobability sampling , qualitative research , palliative care , medicine , end of life care , psychology , social psychology , sociology , social science , population , environmental health , archaeology , pathology , history
Aims and objectives To explore how Flemish nurses working in hospitals and home care experience their involvement in the care of patients requesting euthanasia 15 years after the legalisation of euthanasia. Background Euthanasia was legalised in Belgium in 2002. Despite prior research that charted the experiences of nurses in euthanasia care before and right after legalisation in Belgium, it remains unclear how Flemish nurses currently, 15 years after the legalisation, experience their involvement. Design A grounded theory design, using semi‐structured in‐depth interviews. Methods We interviewed 26 nurses working in hospitals or in home care, who had experience with caring for patients requesting euthanasia. Data were collected using a purposive sample and then a snowball sample. Data collection and data analysis were conducted simultaneously. Data were analysed by using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines. Results Caring for a patient requesting euthanasia continues to be an intense experience characterised by ambivalence. The nature of euthanasia itself contributes to the intensity of this care process. The nurses described euthanasia as something unnatural and planned that generated many questions and doubts. Nevertheless, most interviewees stated that they were able to contribute to a dignified end of life and make a difference, giving them a profound feeling of professional fulfilment. However, when nurses were not able to contribute to good euthanasia care, they struggled with strong negative feelings and frustrations. Conclusion Although the results suggest some subtle shifts in nurses' experiences over time, they do not indicate perceptions of euthanasia as a normal practice by the nurses involved. Relevance to clinical practice The study reveals the need for more clarification of nurses' ethical responsibility in euthanasia care and their role as moral agents.