Premium
Medication administration and interruptions in nursing homes: A qualitative observational study
Author(s) -
Odberg Kristian Ringsby,
Hansen Britt Sætre,
Aase Karina,
Wangensteen Sigrid
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.14138
Subject(s) - observational study , medicine , nursing , qualitative research , patient safety , health care , administration (probate law) , social science , pathology , sociology , political science , law , economics , economic growth
Aims and objectives To contribute in‐depth knowledge of the characteristics of medication administration and interruptions in nursing homes. The following research questions guided the study: How can the medication administration process in nursing homes be described? How can interruptions during the medication administration process in nursing homes be characterized?Background Medication administration is a vital process across healthcare settings, and earlier research in nursing homes is sparse. The medication administration process is prone to interruptions that may lead to adverse drug events. On the other hand, interruptions may also have positive effects on patient safety. Design A qualitative observational study design was applied. Methods Data were collected using partial participant observations. An inductive content analysis was performed. Results Factors that contributed to the observed complexity of medication administration in nursing homes were the high number of single tasks, varying degree of linearity, the variability of technological solutions, demands regarding documentation and staff's apparent freedom as to how and where to perform medication‐related activities. Interruptions during medication administration are prevalent and can be characterised as passive (e.g., alarm and background noises), active (e.g., discussions) or technological interruptions (e.g., use of mobile applications). Most interruptions have negative outcomes, while some have positive outcomes. Conclusions A process of normalisation has taken place whereby staff put up with second‐rate technological solutions, noise and interruptions when they are performing medication‐related tasks. Before seeking to minimise interruptions during the medication administration process, it is important to understand the interconnectivity of the elements using a systems approach. Relevance to clinical practice Staff and management need to be aware of the normalisation of interruptions. Knowledge of the complexity of medication administration may raise awareness and highlight the importance of maintaining and enhancing staff competence.