z-logo
Premium
Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?
Author(s) -
Kilpatrick Kelley,
Jabbour Mira,
Fortin Chantal
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.13085
Subject(s) - active listening , nursing , interpersonal communication , health care , focus group , qualitative research , psychology , perception , medicine , descriptive statistics , social psychology , social science , statistics , business , mathematics , communication , marketing , neuroscience , sociology , economics , economic growth
Aims and objectives To explore patient and family perceptions of team effectiveness of teams those include nurse practitioners in acute and primary care. Background Nurse practitioners provide safe and effective care. Patients are satisfied with the care provided by nurse practitioners. Research examining patient and family perceptions of team effectiveness following the implementation of nurse practitioners in teams is lacking. Design A descriptive qualitative design was used. Methods We used purposeful sampling to identify participants in four clinical specialties. We collected data from March 2014–January 2015 using semi‐structured interviews and demographic questionnaires. Content analysis was used. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results Participants ( n  = 49) believed that the teams were more effective after the implementation of a nurse practitioner and this was important to them. They described processes that teams with nurse practitioners used to effectively provide care. These processes included improved communication, involvement in decision‐making, cohesion, care coordination, problem‐solving, and a focus on the needs of patients and families. Participants highlighted the importance of interpersonal team dynamics. A human approach, trust, being open to discussion, listening to patient and family concerns and respect were particularly valued by participants. Different processes emerged as priorities when data were examined by speciality. However, communication, trust and taking the time to provide care were the most important processes. Conclusion The study provides new insights into the views of patients and families and micro‐level processes in teams with nurse practitioners. The relative importance of each process varied according to the patient's health condition. Patients and providers identified similar team processes. Future research is needed to identify how team processes influence care outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice The findings can support patients, clinicians and decision‐makers to determine the processes to focus on to promote effective team functioning, and involve patients and families as team members.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here