Premium
Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice
Author(s) -
McIlfatrick Sonja,
Hasson Felicity
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.12320
Subject(s) - focus group , palliative care , documentation , usability , needs assessment , health care , nursing , health professionals , holistic nursing , medicine , psychology , medical education , computer science , social science , marketing , human–computer interaction , sociology , economics , programming language , economic growth , business
Aims and objectives To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients' needs using the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice. Background The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients' needs and circumstances. Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of tools to assist this process. Design Mixed‐method research design. Methods Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool ( n = 132) and two focus groups with healthcare professionals ( n = 10). Results The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specifically in relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focus group responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (68·8%) respondents had discussed preferred priorities of care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilst over half of responses ( n = 50; 57·5%) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focus group results indicated questions around healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators. Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects of the tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration. Conclusion The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importance of communication. Relevance to clinical practice A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients' needs in the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool' is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult and sensitive aspects of care.