Premium
Health status of critically ill trauma patients
Author(s) -
Aitken Leanne M,
Chaboyer Wendy,
Schuetz Michael,
Joyce Christopher,
Macfarlane Bonnie
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/jocn.12026
Subject(s) - critically ill , medicine , intensive care medicine , medline , political science , law
Aims and objectives To describe the recovery of trauma intensive care patients up to six months posthospital discharge. Background Injury is a leading cause of preventable mortality and morbidity worldwide, with approximately 10% of hospitalised trauma patients being admitted to intensive care. Intensive care patients experience significant ongoing physical and psychological burden after discharge; however, the patterns of recovery and the subgroups of intensive care patients who experience the greatest burden are not described. Design This prospective cohort study was conducted in one tertiary referral hospital in south‐east Queensland, Australia. Methods Following ethics approval, injured patients who required admission to intensive care provided consent. Participants completed questionnaires prior to hospital discharge ( n = 123) and one ( n = 93) and six months ( n = 88) later. Data included demographic and socioeconomic details, pre‐injury health, injury characteristics, acute care factors, postacute factors [self‐efficacy, illness perception, perceived social support and psychological status as measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the PTSD Civilian Checklist] and health status ( SF ‐36). Results All participants required ongoing support from healthcare providers in the six months after discharge from hospital, and approximately half required support services such as accommodation and home modifications. Approximately 20% of participants reported post‐traumatic stress symptoms, while approximately half the participants reported psychological distress. Average quality of life scores were significantly below the Australian norms both one and six months postdischarge. Conclusions Trauma intensive care patients rely on ongoing healthcare professional and social support services. Compromised health‐related quality of life and psychological health persists at six months. Relevance to clinical practice Effective discharge planning and communication across the care continuum is essential to facilitate access to healthcare providers and other support services in the community setting.