Premium
Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?
Author(s) -
Ye CongXiu,
Chen Jian,
Yang SuLian,
Yi JinLing,
Chen HaiYan,
Li MeiRong,
Yin SongChao,
Lai Wei,
Zheng Yue
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of cosmetic dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.626
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1473-2165
pISSN - 1473-2130
DOI - 10.1111/jocd.13128
Subject(s) - transepidermal water loss , sensitive skin , dermatology , skin type , medicine , skin aging , lactic acid , biology , stratum corneum , pathology , bacteria , genetics
Background For the evaluation results of skin sensitivity, such as clinical parameters, stinging test records and biophysical assessments dates might be impacted by many factors, the influence factors need to be further explored, and the skin sensitivity evaluation process and methodology needed distinction and normalization. In this study, we investigated the changes of sensitive skin indexes and lactic acid stinging test results in different seasons, facial regions, skin photo‐type, and living habits. Methods Twenty‐four healthy subjects had completed this study. Lactic acid stinging test was performed in different seasons. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, sebum secretion, and pH were measured in an environment‐controlled room. Correlations between stinging responses, skin biophysical parameters, and sensitive skin inducements in different seasons were statistically analyzed. Results Skin TEWL, hydration, sebum secretion, and pH values on different facial parts were various. Two‐way correlation analysis between the results of lactic acid stinging test in different seasons and the sensitivity factors showed differences between summer, autumn, and winter. The mean scores of lactic acid stinging test increased in autumn. Linear regression analysis of skin sensitivity factors in type III and type IV photobiology skin found that the frequency of sleeping time and eating spicy food in the past of week could infect the sensitive skin evaluation dates statistically ( P < .05). Discussion/Conclusions Skin sensitivity assessment results were impacted by seasonal transformation, living habits and customs, and facial regions. These indicted that we should consider above interfering factors when evaluated the skin sensitivity for getting more precise dates.