z-logo
Premium
Unit Leadership and Climates for Evidence‐Based Practice Implementation in Acute Care: A Cross‐Sectional Descriptive Study
Author(s) -
Shuman Clayton J.,
Powers Katherine,
BanaszakHoll Jane,
Titler Marita G.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of nursing scholarship
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.009
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1547-5069
pISSN - 1527-6546
DOI - 10.1111/jnu.12452
Subject(s) - descriptive statistics , scale (ratio) , acute care , cross sectional study , psychology , nursing , evidence based practice , unit (ring theory) , medicine , family medicine , health care , alternative medicine , statistics , geography , mathematics , cartography , mathematics education , pathology , economic growth , economics
Purpose The purposes of this study were to (a) describe nurse manager ( NM ) leadership behaviors for evidence‐based practice, NM evidence‐based practice competencies, and unit climates for evidence‐based practice implementation in acute care, and (b) test for differences in NM s’ and staff nurses’ ( RN s’) perceptions. Design A multisite cross‐sectional design was used to collect data from a sample of 24 NM s and 553 RN s from 24 adult medical‐surgical units in seven U.S. community hospitals. Methods Responses were collected using electronic questionnaires, inclusive of the Nurse Manager Evidence‐Based Practice Competency Scale ( NM only), Implementation Leadership Scale, and Implementation Climate Scale. E‐mail reminders and gift card lottery drawings encouraged response. Descriptive statistics described total and subscale scores by role. Differences in perceptions were evaluated using independent t‐tests with Bonferroni correction (α = .05). Findings 23 NM s and 287 RN s responded (95.8% and 51.9% response rates, respectively). NM s reported they were “somewhat competent” in evidence‐based practice ( M = 1.62 [ SD = 0.5]; 0–3 scale). NM s and RN s perceived leadership behaviors ( NM : M = 2.73 [ SD = 0.46]; RN : M = 2.88 [ SD = 0.78]; 0–4 scale) and unit climates for evidence‐based practice implementation ( NM : M = 2.16 [ SD = 0.67]; RN : M = 2.24 [ SD = 0.74]; 0–4 scale) as evident to a “moderate extent.” RN and NM perceptions differed significantly on the Proactive ( p = .01) and Knowledgeable ( p < .001) leadership subscales. Conclusions Evidence‐based practice competencies and leadership behaviors of NM s, and unit climates for evidence‐based practice were modest at best and interventions are needed. To close the research to practice gap, future studies should investigate the interplay between social dynamic context factors and implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence‐based practices. Clinical Relevance Critical attention is needed to build organizational capacity for evidence‐based practices through development of unit leadership and climate for evidence‐based practice to accelerate routine use of evidence‐based practices for improving care delivery and patient outcomes. The three instruments described herein provide a foundation for nurse leaders to assess these dynamic context factors and design interventions or programs where there is opportunity for improvement.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here