Premium
Double‐Layer Masking of Suffering After Pregnancy Loss: A Grounded Theory Study from a Male Perspective
Author(s) -
FernándezBasanta Sara,
Coronado Carmen,
MovillaFernández MaríaJesús
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of midwifery and women's health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.543
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1542-2011
pISSN - 1526-9523
DOI - 10.1111/jmwh.13353
Subject(s) - grounded theory , conceptualization , psychology , pregnancy , feeling , meaning (existential) , distancing , social psychology , developmental psychology , perspective (graphical) , qualitative research , psychotherapist , sociology , medicine , disease , social science , covid-19 , pathology , artificial intelligence , biology , computer science , infectious disease (medical specialty) , genetics
Men can express different responses after pregnancy loss. This loss can interfere with their expectation of parenthood, new life, and future hopes. Expectations from the social construction of gender can encourage them to maintain an image that contradicts their actual feelings. This can lead to isolation, distancing, and difficulties in seeking support. The scarcity and low representation of men in previous studies makes research that captures the complexity of their experience necessary. The aim of this study was to explore how men confront the suffering caused by pregnancy loss. Methods This study is part of a larger research project focusing on the experiences of parents and midwives following pregnancy loss. In this study, 22 cisgender and white heterosexual men who experienced pregnancy losses participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed iteratively using constructivist grounded theory methods. Results The substantive theory of double‐layer masking of suffering emerged as way to explain the confrontation of suffering after pregnancy loss from the male perspective. The themes, (1) suffering beyond physical loss, (2) rationalization in the search for meaning, and (3) keeping a façade with others, show the impact that this loss had on men, which was masked by the meaning they gave to the situation and by its social expression. Discussion The findings provide a theoretical conceptualization of the masking these men use to deal with the suffering they experienced from this situation. These aspects provide reasons for including these individuals in the assistance given by midwives after a pregnancy loss. Collaboration between specialized and primary care, along with staff training and support, is necessary for the provision of couple‐centered care after pregnancy loss.