Premium
Rural Residents’ Perinatal Experiences During the Initial Months of the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study in British Columbia
Author(s) -
Sullivan Eva,
Cameron Audrey,
Kornelsen Jude
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of midwifery and women's health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.543
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1542-2011
pISSN - 1526-9523
DOI - 10.1111/jmwh.13338
Subject(s) - pandemic , thematic analysis , focus group , qualitative research , rural area , psychological resilience , medicine , anxiety , referral , health care , psychology , nursing , covid-19 , economic growth , disease , psychiatry , sociology , social psychology , social science , pathology , anthropology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , economics
Many studies have explored the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on perinatal health, but few have examined the effects of the pandemic on birthing families through a rural lens. Given that the COVID‐19 pandemic has reinforced long‐standing disparities between urban and rural communities, it is important that the significance of place on the health and wellness of rural populations is made visible. Methods In‐depth interviews and focus groups with 16 participants from rural communities in British Columbia, Canada, were performed. Participants included those who had been pregnant or given birth after March 11, 2020. Data from the interviews and focus groups were analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis to understand the perinatal experiences of rural families during the initial months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Results Analysis of the data revealed 4 major themes: perceived risk of infection, navigating uncertainty, experience of care received, and resilience and silver linings. In general, participants conceptualized rural communities as safer bubbles. Exceptions included specific vectors of risk such as tourism travel and border communities. Challenges experienced by rural families including anxiety around changing health guidelines, reduced social support, and potential loss of their partners’ support at births. Additional concerns specific to rural experiences added to this burden, including fear of traveling to referral centers for care and increased difficulties accessing resources. Discussion Participants reported positive, compassionate care experiences that helped to mitigate some of the added stressors of the pandemic. These findings highlight the importance of perinatal care provision that integrates physiologic and mental health supports. This study provides a foundation for a comprehensive inquiry into the experiences of rural perinatal services during COVID‐19.