How Collaborative Practice Agreements Impede the Administration of Vital Women's Health Services

Women's health services delivered by nurse practitioners (NP) and certified nurse‐midwives (CNM) are safe and effective, often providing a crucial point of access in underserved regions. However, restrictive and unnecessary regulatory requirements, such as collaborative practice agreements, create artificial barriers to practice. Methods This analysis used a subsample of respondents from a large national study focused on the common challenges and practice restrictions introduced by collaborative practice agreements. This cohort included respondents licensed in all 22 states that place some level of restriction on one or both roles. This study used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to examine the financial and administrative constraints collaborative practice agreements place on NPs and CNMs. Results The median fee to establish a collaborative agreement was $500 (n = 25; interquartile range [IQR], $175‐$1200; range, $30‐$3000). The monthly median fee to maintain a collaborative agreement was $500 (n = 29; IQR, $250‐$1200; range, $100‐$2000). NPs and CNMs working in rural areas and remotely are more likely to encounter barriers to practice. Similarly, the loss or lack of supervising physicians and fees were also identified as impediments to care. Discussion Removing unnecessary regulatory requirements permits NPs and CNMs to be full market participants, thereby allowing them to address health care disparities in women's health and primary care settings. Targeted legislative efforts should seek to improve access to these vital services and re‐establish evidence‐based patient care and safety best practices as the drivers of health care regulation.