Premium
AutoIHC‐scoring : a machine learning framework for automated Allred scoring of molecular expression in ER‐ and PR‐stained breast cancer tissue
Author(s) -
TEWARY S.,
ARUN I.,
AHMED R.,
CHATTERJEE S.,
CHAKRABORTY C.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of microscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.569
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2818
pISSN - 0022-2720
DOI - 10.1111/jmi.12596
Subject(s) - artificial intelligence , decision tree , random forest , breast cancer , immunohistochemistry , machine learning , naive bayes classifier , computer science , correlation , oestrogen receptor , pearson product moment correlation coefficient , pathology , medicine , pattern recognition (psychology) , cancer , support vector machine , mathematics , statistics , geometry
Summary In prognostic evaluation of breast cancer Immunohistochemical (IHC) markers namely, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) are widely used. The expert pathologist investigates qualitatively the stained tissue slide under microscope to provide the Allred score; which is clinically used for therapeutic decision making. Such qualitative judgment is time‐consuming, tedious and more often suffers from interobserver variability. As a result, it leads to imprecise IHC score for ER and PR. To overcome this, there is an urgent need of developing a reliable and efficient IHC quantifier for high throughput decision making. In view of this, our study aims at developing an automated IHC profiler for quantitative assessment of ER and PR molecular expression from stained tissue images. We propose here to use CMYK colour space for positively and negatively stained cell extraction for proportion score. Also colour features are used for quantitative assessment of intensity scoring among the positively stained cells. Five different machine learning models namely artificial neural network, Naïve Bayes, K‐nearest neighbours, decision tree and random forest are considered for learning the colour features using average red, green and blue pixel values of positively stained cell patches. Fifty cases of ER‐ and PR‐stained tissues have been evaluated for validation with the expert pathologist's score. All five models perform adequately where random forest shows the best correlation with the expert's score (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.9192). In the proposed approach the average variation of diaminobenzidine (DAB) to nuclear area from the expert's score is found to be 7.58%, as compared to 27.83% for state‐of‐the‐art ImmunoRatio software.