Premium
Welding Equipment under the Energy‐related Products Directive
Author(s) -
Schischke Karsten,
Nissen Nils F.,
Lang KlausDieter
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of industrial ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.377
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1530-9290
pISSN - 1088-1980
DOI - 10.1111/jiec.12164
Subject(s) - ecodesign , directive , compromise , industrial ecology , robustness (evolution) , environmental economics , computer science , risk analysis (engineering) , product (mathematics) , resource (disambiguation) , energy policy , european union , management science , manufacturing engineering , business , economics , engineering , sustainability , renewable energy , social science , mathematics , ecology , computer network , chemistry , sociology , biology , biochemistry , geometry , programming language , gene , economic policy , electrical engineering
Summary A broad range of energy‐using products have been analyzed to shape the eco‐design requirements for the European market under the Ecodesign Framework Directive 2009/125/EC in the last several years. Only recently, this approach also addressed production equipment, including ovens, furnaces, machine tools, and related machinery. Welding equipment has been subject to such an analysis as part of the study on machine tools. This article summarizes the individual steps of this technical, economic, and environmental analysis to facilitate the understanding of the policy intentions: The study followed a standardized methodology and identified, through this approach, a significant energy savings potential of 7.6 petajoules per year and suitable policy options. The article discusses these options, addressing in particular the challenges faced by industrial equipment. Some shortcomings of the methodology to be used have to be stated. These are time and resource constraints to develop policy measures with adequate resources, uncertain market evidence, and the challenge to forecast the effect of engineering options not yet implemented in a product. Under these conditions, the findings are a compromise between feasibility and scientific robustness.