Premium
Development, validation and implementation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess habitual vitamin D intake
Author(s) -
Kiely M.,
Collins A.,
Lucey A. J.,
Andersen R.,
Cashman K. D.,
Hennessy Á.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of human nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.951
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1365-277X
pISSN - 0952-3871
DOI - 10.1111/jhn.12348
Subject(s) - medicine , food frequency questionnaire , interquartile range , confidence interval , vitamin , vitamin d and neurology , environmental health , demography , sociology
Abstract Background A well‐designed, validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire ( FFQ ) could offer an efficient and cost‐effective method for assessing habitual vitamin D intake. The present study aimed to describe the development, validation and implementation of a vitamin D FFQ . Methods National food consumption survey data obtained from Irish adults (18–64 years) were used to identify foods that contribute 95% of vitamin D intake. A winter‐based validation study was carried out for the resulting FFQ in 120 females, including 98 women [mean (SD) 65.0 (7.3) years] and 22 girls [12.2 (0.8) years], using a 14‐day diet history ( DH ) as a comparator. Serum 25( OH )D concentrations were analysed. Validity coefficients were calculated using the method of triads. Cross‐classification and Bland–Altman analysis were also performed. Results Median (interquartile range) vitamin D intakes (including the contribution from nutritional supplements) were 5.4 (3.7) and 3.7 (5.9) μg day −1 from the FFQ and DH , respectively and intakes of vitamin D from food sources were 3.6 (3.1) and 2.4 (2.2) μg day −1 . The FFQ and DH classified 86% and 87% of individuals into the same and adjacent thirds of wintertime serum 25( OH )D status, respectively. There was a strong association ( r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and no significant systematic or proportional bias observed for the difference between estimates from the FFQ and DH . The validity coefficient for the FFQ was 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.80–0.97). Repeatability analysis ( n = 56) performed 6–12 months later showed no significant difference in estimates of vitamin D between administrations. Conclusions The data obtained in the present study indicate high validity and good reproducibility of a short, interviewer‐administered FFQ for vitamin D.