z-logo
Premium
Development, validation and implementation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess habitual vitamin D intake
Author(s) -
Kiely M.,
Collins A.,
Lucey A. J.,
Andersen R.,
Cashman K. D.,
Hennessy Á.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of human nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.951
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1365-277X
pISSN - 0952-3871
DOI - 10.1111/jhn.12348
Subject(s) - medicine , food frequency questionnaire , interquartile range , confidence interval , vitamin , vitamin d and neurology , environmental health , demography , sociology
Background A well‐designed, validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire ( FFQ ) could offer an efficient and cost‐effective method for assessing habitual vitamin D intake. The present study aimed to describe the development, validation and implementation of a vitamin D FFQ . Methods National food consumption survey data obtained from Irish adults (18–64 years) were used to identify foods that contribute 95% of vitamin D intake. A winter‐based validation study was carried out for the resulting FFQ in 120 females, including 98 women [mean (SD) 65.0 (7.3) years] and 22 girls [12.2 (0.8) years], using a 14‐day diet history ( DH ) as a comparator. Serum 25( OH )D concentrations were analysed. Validity coefficients were calculated using the method of triads. Cross‐classification and Bland–Altman analysis were also performed. Results Median (interquartile range) vitamin D intakes (including the contribution from nutritional supplements) were 5.4 (3.7) and 3.7 (5.9) μg day −1 from the FFQ and DH , respectively and intakes of vitamin D from food sources were 3.6 (3.1) and 2.4 (2.2) μg day −1 . The FFQ and DH classified 86% and 87% of individuals into the same and adjacent thirds of wintertime serum 25( OH )D status, respectively. There was a strong association ( r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and no significant systematic or proportional bias observed for the difference between estimates from the FFQ and DH . The validity coefficient for the FFQ was 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.80–0.97). Repeatability analysis ( n = 56) performed 6–12 months later showed no significant difference in estimates of vitamin D between administrations. Conclusions The data obtained in the present study indicate high validity and good reproducibility of a short, interviewer‐administered FFQ for vitamin D.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom