Premium
The association between portion size, nutrient intake and gestational weight gain: a secondary analysis in the WATCH study 2006/7
Author(s) -
Blumfield M. L.,
Schreurs M.,
Rollo M. E.,
MacDonaldWicks L. K.,
Kokavec A.,
Collins C. E.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of human nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.951
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1365-277X
pISSN - 0952-3871
DOI - 10.1111/jhn.12330
Subject(s) - medicine , overweight , pregnancy , weight gain , confounding , body mass index , gestation , nutrient , obesity , obstetrics , environmental health , demography , body weight , chemistry , genetics , organic chemistry , sociology , biology
Background Excessive gestational weight gain ( GWG ) is associated with adverse maternal–child health outcomes. Managing energy intake and GWG versus optimising nutrient intake can be challenging. The present study aimed to examine the relationships between dietary portion size, GWG and nutrient intakes during pregnancy. It is hypothesised that, after adjustment for potential confounders, portion size would be positively associated with both GWG and nutrient intakes during pregnancy. Methods Prospective data were obtained for 179 Australian women from the Women and Their Children's Health Study. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used at 18–24 and 36–40 weeks of gestation to quantify diet and portion size during the previous 3 months of pregnancy. Nutrient intakes were compared with Australian Nutrient Reference Values ( NRV s). GWG was measured up to 36 weeks and compared with the Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations (WtAdh). Results In multivariate regression models, portion size factor ( PSF ) was positively associated with GWG in women with high socio‐economic status ( SES ; β = 0.20, P = 0.04) and those with an overweight/obese pre‐pregnancy body mass index ( BMI ) (β = 0.28, P = 0.04). PSF uniquely accounted for 8.2% and 3.7% of the variability in GWG for women with high SES and overweight/obese pre‐pregnancy BMI s, respectively. Nutrient intakes and PSF were similar regardless of WtAdh. Women achieved NRV s for calcium and zinc in all PSF categories. Most of the women with large PSF still failed to achieve the NRV s for folate (95.7%), iron (89.6%) and fibre (85.5%). Conclusions All women require advice on quality food choices during pregnancy to optimise health outcomes. Targeting portion size alone is insufficient to manage GWG but may prove to be a valuable tool in pregnant women of high SES and/or those who are overweight/obese pre‐pregnancy.