z-logo
Premium
Effect of Hurricane Irma on daily direct‐care nurse staffing in nursing homes
Author(s) -
Jester Dylan J.,
Thomas Kali S.,
Peterson Lindsay J.,
Dosa David M.,
Andel Ross,
Hyer Kathryn
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.17220
Subject(s) - staffing , medicine , nursing , certification , nursing assistant , emergency department , family medicine , emergency medicine , medical emergency , nursing homes , political science , law
Abstract Objectives To examine the effect of Hurricane Irma on staff‐related financial expenditures and daily direct‐care nurse staffing levels. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting September 3–24, 2017 in the state of Florida, United States. Hurricane Irma made landfall on September 10, 2017. Participants Six hundred and fifty‐three nursing homes (NHs), 81 evacuated facilities, and 572 facilities that sheltered‐in‐place. Measurements This study used data from Payroll‐Based Journaling (PBJ), Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER), and Florida's health providers' emergency reporting system. PBJ provided estimates of daily direct‐care nurse staffing levels for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. CASPER reported facility‐level characteristics such as profit status, chain membership, and special care unit availability. Florida's emergency reporting system identified evacuation status during Hurricane Irma. Linear mixed‐effects models were used to estimate the unique contribution of evacuation status on daily staffing increases over time from September 3 to 10. Results Among all facilities, we found significant increases in staffing for licensed practical nurses ( p  = 0.02) and certified nursing assistants ( p  < 0.001), but not for registered nurses ( p  = 0.10) before Hurricane Irma made landfall. From 1 week before landfall to 2 weeks after landfall (September 3–24), an additional estimated $2.41 million was spent on direct‐care nurse staffing. In comparison to facilities that sheltered‐in‐place, evacuated facilities increased staffing levels of all nurse types (all p  < 0.001). At landfall, evacuated facilities spent an estimated $93.74 on nurse staffing per resident whereas facilities that sheltered‐in‐place spent $76.10 on nurse staffing per resident. Conclusion NHs face unprecedented challenges during hurricanes, including maintaining adequate direct‐care nurse staffing levels to meet the needs of their residents. NHs that evacuated residents had an increase in direct‐care nurse staffing that was greater than that seen in NHs that sheltered‐in‐place.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here