Premium
Hospital at Home services: An inventory of fee‐for‐service payments to inform Medicare reimbursement
Author(s) -
DeCherrie Linda V.,
Wardlow Liane,
Ornstein Katherine A.,
Crowley Christopher,
Lubetsky Sara,
Stuck Amy R.,
Siu Albert L.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.17140
Subject(s) - medicine , medicaid , reimbursement , family medicine , acute care , health care , medical home , payment , medicare advantage , medical emergency , nursing , finance , primary care , economics , economic growth
Background Hospital at Home (HaH) is a growing model of care with proven patient benefits. However, for the types of services required to provide an episode of HaH, full Medicare reimbursement is traditionally paid only if care is provided in inpatient facilities. Design This project identifies HaH services that could be reimbursable under Medicare to inform episodic care within fee‐for‐service (FFS) Medicare. Setting All data are derived from acute services provided from the Mount Sinai HaH program between 2014 and 2017 as part of a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) demonstration program. Participants The sample was limited to patients with one of the following five admitting diagnoses: urinary tract infection ( n = 70), pneumonia ( n = 60), cellulitis ( n = 45), heart failure ( n = 37), and chronic lung disease ( n = 24) for a total of 236 acute episodes. Measurements HaH services were inventoried from three sources: electronic medical records, Medicare billing and itemized vendor billing. For each admitting diagnosis, four reimbursement scenarios were evaluated: (1) FFS Medicare without a home health episode, (2) FFS Medicare with a home health episode, (3) two‐sided risk ACO with a home health episode, and (4) two‐sided risk ACO without a home health episode. Results Across diagnoses, there were 1.5–1.9 MD visits and 1.5–2.7 nursing visits per episode. The Medicare FFS model without home health care had the lowest reimbursement potential ($964–$1604) per episode. The Medicare fee‐for‐service within ACO models with home health care had the greatest potential for reimbursement $4519–$4718. There was limited variation in costs by diagnosis. Conclusion and Relevance Though existing payment models might be used to pay for many HaH acute services, significant gaps in reimbursement remain. Extending the benefits of HaH to the Medicare beneficiaries that are likely to derive the greatest benefit will require new payment models for FFS Medicare.