Premium
Validation of Perceived Mental Fatigability Using the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale
Author(s) -
Renner Sharon W.,
Bear Todd M.,
Brown Patrick J.,
Andersen Stacy L.,
Cosentino Stephanie,
Gmelin Theresa,
Boudreau Robert M.,
Cauley Jane A.,
Qiao Yujia (Susanna),
Simonsick Eleanor M.,
Glynn Nancy W.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.17017
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , concurrent validity , medicine , construct validity , confirmatory factor analysis , convergent validity , clinical psychology , gerontology , psychometrics , psychology , structural equation modeling , internal consistency , statistics , mathematics
Objectives Establish reliability, concurrent and convergent validity of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Mental subscale. Design Cross‐sectional. Setting Older adults from two University of Pittsburgh registries, Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), and Long Life Family Study (LLFS). Participants PFS Mental subscale validation was conducted using three cohorts: (1) Development Sample (N = 664, 59.1% women, age 74.8 ± 6.4 years, PFS Mental scores 10.3 ± 9.1), (2) Validation Sample I—BLSA (N = 430, 51.9% women, age 74.5 ± 8.2 years, PFS Mental scores 9.4 ± 7.9), and (3) Validation Sample II—LLFS (N = 1,917, 54.5% women, age 72.2 ± 9.3 years, PFS Mental scores 7.5 ± 8.2). Measurements Development Sample, Validation Sample I—BLSA, and Validation Sample II—LLFS participants self‐administered the 10‐item Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale. Validation Sample II—LLFS completed cognition measures (Trail Making Tests A and B), depressive symptomatology (Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression Scale, CES‐D), and global fatigue from two CES‐D items. Results In the Development Sample and Validation Sample I—BLSA, confirmatory factor analysis showed all 10 items loaded on two factors: social and physical activities (fit indices: SRMSR = 0.064, RMSEA = 0.095, CFI = 0.91). PFS Mental scores had strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and good test‐retest reliability (ICC = 0.78). Validation Sample II—LLFS PFS Mental scores demonstrated moderate concurrent and construct validity using Pearson ( r ) or Spearman ( ρ ) correlations against measures of cognition (Trail Making Tests A ( r = 0.14) and B ( r = 0.17) time), depressive symptoms ( r = 0.31), and global fatigue ( ρ = 0.21). Additionally, the PFS Mental subscale had strong convergent validity, discriminating according to established clinical or cognitive testing cut points, with differences in PFS Mental scores ranging from 3.9 to 7.6 points (all P < .001). All analyses were adjusted for family relatedness, field center, age, sex, and education. Conclusions The validated PFS Mental subscale may be used in clinical and research settings as a sensitive, one‐page self‐administered tool of perceived mental fatigability in older adults.