Premium
The Effects of Dementia Care Co‐Management on Acute Care, Hospice, and Long‐Term Care Utilization
Author(s) -
Jennings Lee A.,
Hollands Simon,
Keeler Emmett,
Wenger Neil S.,
Reuben David B.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.16667
Subject(s) - medicine , dementia , odds ratio , acute care , emergency medicine , intensive care unit , intervention (counseling) , confidence interval , emergency department , long term care , family medicine , intensive care medicine , health care , nursing , disease , economics , economic growth
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Although nurse practitioner dementia care co‐management has been shown to reduce total cost of care for fee‐for‐service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries, the reasons for cost savings are unknown. To further understand the impact of dementia co‐management on costs, we examined acute care utilization, long‐term care admissions, and hospice use of program enrollees as compared with persons with dementia not in the program using FFS and managed Medicare claims data. DESIGN Quasi‐experimental controlled before‐and‐after comparison. SETTING Urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 856 University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Alzheimer's and Dementia Care program patients were enrolled between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, and 3,139 similar UCLA patients with dementia not in the program. Comparison patients were identified as having dementia using International Classification of Diseases‐9 codes and natural language processing of clinical notes. Coarsened exact matching was used to reduce covariate imbalance between intervention and comparison patients. INTERVENTION Dementia co‐management model using nurse practitioners partnered with primary care providers and community organizations. MEASUREMENTS Average difference‐in‐differences per quarter over the 2.5‐year intervention period for all‐cause hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and number of inpatient hospitalization days; admissions to long‐term care facilities; and hospice use in the last 6 months of life. RESULTS Intervention patients had fewer ED visits (odds ratio [OR] = .80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .66–.97) and shorter hospital length of stay (incident rate ratio = .74; 95% CI = .55–.99). There were no significant differences between groups for hospitalizations or ICU stays. Program participants were less likely to be admitted to a long‐term care facility (hazard ratio = .65; 95% CI = .47–.89) and more likely to receive hospice services in the last 6 months of life (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.13–2.37). CONCLUSION Comprehensive nurse practitioner dementia care co‐management reduced ED visits, shortened hospital length of stay, increased hospice use, and delayed admission to long‐term care.