z-logo
Premium
Not Wasting a Crisis: How Geriatrics Clinical Research Can Remain Engaged During COVID ‐19
Author(s) -
Goh Eileen Fabia,
Tan Cai Ning,
Pek Kalene,
Leong Siyun,
Wong Wei Chin,
Lim Wee Shiong
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.16569
Subject(s) - geriatrics , medicine , pandemic , institutional review board , informed consent , distancing , covid-19 , public relations , alternative medicine , psychiatry , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , political science , pathology
To the Editor: We applaud Nicol et al. for their timely article highlighting the new norm of “action at a distance” for geriatrics clinical research against the backdrop of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Like many countries enforcing physical distancing to flatten the coronavirus curve, Singapore has implemented a critical 8-week circuit breaker period. The apt reminder that we must persist and adapt to help our older patients and study participants reinforces our conviction of “not wasting a crisis” to draw meaningful lessons in an unprecedented calamity. In this letter, we share our 3Rs perspective of how we remain engaged as a geriatrics clinical research institute during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom