Premium
Feasibility of Delivering a Tailored Intervention for Advance Care Planning in Primary Care Practice
Author(s) -
Paiva Andrea,
Redding Colleen A.,
Ian Lynne,
Zei Maria,
O'Leary John R.,
Fried Terri R.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/jgs.16035
Subject(s) - medicine , intervention (counseling) , randomized controlled trial , cluster randomised controlled trial , advance care planning , baseline (sea) , quality of life (healthcare) , cluster (spacecraft) , primary care , family medicine , physical therapy , health care , nursing , palliative care , oceanography , surgery , geology , economic growth , computer science , economics , programming language
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial providing individualized feedback reports to increase advance care planning (ACP) engagement in the primary care setting. DESIGN Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING Two primary care practices selected for geographic colocation. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 55 years and older. INTERVENTION Brief assessment of readiness to engage in (stage of change for) three ACP behaviors (healthcare agent assignment, communication with agent about quality vs quantity of life, and living will completion) generating an individualized feedback report, plus a stage‐matched brochure. MEASURES Patient recruitment and retention, intervention delivery, baseline characteristics, and stage of change movement. RESULTS Recruitment rates differed by practice. Several baseline sociodemographic characteristics differed between the 38 intervention and 41 control participants, including employment status, education, and communication with healthcare agent. Feedback was successfully delivered to all intervention participants, and over 90% of participants completed a 2‐month follow‐up. More intervention participants demonstrated progression in readiness than did control participants, without testing for statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS This pilot demonstrates opportunities and challenges of performing a clustered randomized controlled trial in primary care practices. Differences in the two practice populations highlight the challenges of matching sites. There was a signal for behavior change in the intervention group. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1917–1921, 2019
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom